Gary Webb and the Fate of Dissent

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." --Thomas Jefferson

Gary Webb, the former San Jose Mercury News reporter who unveiled the dark alliance between shadow forces with government connections and the drug business, supposedly committed suicide in 1994. I say supposedly because he is alleged to have fired two gun shots into his own cranium, and it kind of stretches credibility to believe he had the presence of mind to fire a second one. He had been gradually edged out of the news profession after his paper withdrew its support--a reporter who had won the Pulitzer prize for previous journalistic work.

Some of the suicides of whistleblowers are actually engineered from behind the scenes using the incredible capabilities of the synthetic telepathy, as it is now sometimes called, by making the lives of the targets quite miserable with relentless stalking combined with all kinds of torture-harassment, which even includes maneuvering the behaviors of key persons in that target's environment to be detrimental to him/her. The stalkers seem to have virtually no opposition from those entrusted with law enforcement however much the victim may complain. In my case I have complained through all kinds of channels for actual decades, to no seeming avail. Lately my perps have alternated between choking my adenoids till I can't breath through inducing tissue swelling, and wafting mental states at me from seemingly spiritually and emotionally broken down sources as means of disablement, for instance. The victim who is not even aware of their capabilities, who is not aware of being acted upon, and hence mistakes these states for his own, is even more vulnerable to collapse, because he is more fatalistic about their origin and any prospect of relief or cure. Of course this (induced suicide) is a favorite method of elimination of dissent because of its plausible deniability. A striking number of prominent dissidents in the last few decades have taken their own lives or have otherwise disappeared prematurely. Abbie Hoffman, for example, who in public lectures actually discussed CIA assassinations disguised as suicides, then ultimately proceeded to take his own life. Some targets could fall victim to other means of remote influence with the technology, such as inducement of heart attack, stroke, or cancer (as radiation is carcinogenic), all of which can be attributed to natural causes. With this neutralization of dissent free criticism of social injustice becomes ever more scarce, and the public becomes more like a homogeneous mesmerized flock without leadership for constructive change.

Gary Webb's story found its way back onto the Internet after his death. It can still be viewed at http://www.narconews.com/darkalliance/drugs/start.htm

He also leaves us with the book he wrote on the story entitled "Dark Alliance." There are also some videos on YouTube.

There is another even more sinister chapter in history which needs to be unveiled--the connection between mind control and forms of human trafficking which included organized prostitution rings and sex slavery. This connection is so egregious that I cannot let it rest, because of the human misery it must have wrought, and might still be causing, since no crack down on these activities ever really occur because of public ignorance. This is another area of typical organized crime involvement which seems to have had sanction by users of this technology. Regular slavery is bad enough, but compounded by the use of MC technology it is horrendous.

Gary Webb--a canary in the American mineshaft personal quote (from Wikipedia biography of Webb):

"If we had met five years ago, you wouldn't have found a more staunch defender of the newspaper industry than me ... I was winning awards, getting raises, lecturing college classes, appearing on TV shows, and judging journalism contests. So how could I possibly agree with people like Noam Chomsky and Ben Bagdikian, who were claiming the system didn't work, that it was steered by powerful special interests and corporations, and existed to protect the power elite? And then I wrote some stories that made me realize how sadly misplaced my bliss had been. The reason I'd enjoyed such smooth sailing for so long hadn't been, as I'd assumed, because I was careful and diligent and good at my job ... The truth was that, in all those years, I hadn't written anything important enough to suppress....”

I found an interesting web site at http://www.hightechharassment.com/.

Although it is kind of rambling and could be fraught with myriad innaccuracies, what is laid down is more or less a faithful representation of the changes that have covertly taken place in American society (and perhaps elsewhere in the world) due to incredible advances in high technology. The public is never told about these. They are controlled like proverbial sheep by the mass media, in whom they place implicit trust because of their misconception that free speech is (overtly) protected by the legal system, when in fact biological control technology is covertly undermining the autonomy of the individual and the mechanisms of free speech and free will, to the point at which free speech and free thought are in grave jeopardy. Of these developments the average citizen has no clue because he is never told. The probable justification for keeping the development under wraps is that said technology is maximally dangerous in enemy hands, which might be granted as true. What goes unsaid is that it is also maximally dangerous in the hands of domestic forces which have been entrusted with the public good, but which in fact are currently riddled with awful corruption and even perversion. This perversion of the public welfare is horrendous and unconscionable and is protected by secrecy.

People typically find out about the technology only when they have become a target for elimination, due to ruffling the feathers of the cryptocracy through some type of (often innocent) nonconformity. They may even misinterpret what they are experiencing to the point where they are still actually clueless about what is happening to them, attributing it (as that website implies) to paranormal events or some type of magical phenemena rooted in peasant superstition. Secrecy is therefore dangerous and contributes to the defacto abolition of free society as we used to know it before the technological revolution which has occurred. Because there are no restraints at all being placed on the perpetrators by a public which is kept everlastingly in the dark. There is terrible corruption on the part of that secret cryptocracy, who acquire unbridled powers of life and death over the citizenry. As we all know, power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. So what we end up with is a virtual dictatorship similar to that which existed in the old U.S.S.R., with psychiatry being used as an effective tool for the elimination of dissent, nonconformity, and anyone who in the least offends the power structure and its secret agenda. However positive that agenda might seem on the surface, the judgements of the secret planners are not a desirable substitute for an open democracy predicated on the welfare of the people. And we should not allow a secret cryptocracy to exert powers of life and death over an unwitting public. That is tyranny.

Interesting article on electronic mind control at Washington Post

[This blog was intended as an adjunct to my now defunct website at Geocities, outlining my victimization with EMF technology. Geocities was dismantled October, 2009, and with it my website, which has yet to be replaced. This was actually just as well, as it may have caused more harm than good by being overly specific and hence inviting danger.]

Sometimes developments in electronic mind control actually make their way into the mainstream press, usually in such a way that the public will not take them too seriously. Check out:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011001399.html

(thanks to link at Cheryl Welsh website at http://www.mindjustice.org/ ,
one of the most comprehensive clearinghouses on the web for information on the mind control technology)


Personal thoughts:
Yesterday was election day. At least the president elect is of such an age and state of health that he can sustain emc attacks without stroke. Will it be a brand new day, or business as usual? The question must be proferred with some sense of irony, considering the number of changings of the guard which have occurred in the 35-year duration of the problem (of illicit mind control).

I found a strangely apropos quote in the book Operation Mind Control (c. 1978) by the recently deceased author Walter Bowart:

There is no one who dispenses freedom, but there are
many who would take it away. Freedom is not free; it must
be won. The individual must stand with others against even
the smallest tyranny. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
Former CIA official Victor Marchetti put it plainly
when he told Freedom News Service what he thought
ought to be done.
When pressed for concrete examples of what a citizen
can do to curb secrecy, dismantle the cryptocracy, and return
democracy to the people, he said, "You know, you
just can't beat it. The only way you're going to clean up
some of these outfits would be if a President came in there
and said, 'Well, I'm just not going to tolerate some of this
stuff.' And even then it would be difficult for the President
because this bureaucracy is so entrenched and so fortified
that it has connections all over in our society.
"The CIA and the FBI do not completely control the
office of the President obviously, but they have an awful lot
of influence in that office. Their influence derives from
their capabilities and the fact that they operate in secrecy
. . . They are not really concerned with the public interest.
They always hide behind such things as 'national security'
and they say that their activities are in the 'national interests'
but the record doesn't substantiate that.
"You may stem the tide, and then begin to push it back,
but you're not going to change it overnight. This thing was
building for thirty-five years. . . . These guys aren't going
to just change. They're going to go down swinging; we've
seen that already."

The full text of the book can be downloaded at the links

http://www.rense.com/general96/Operation_Mind_Control.pdf

https://wikispooks.com/w/images/e/e2/Operation_Mind_Control.pdf

I was aware of this book quite a few years ago in the early stages of my dilemma. Its presentations were better than nothing. The only criticism I have is that the main forms of mind control which interest me, which involve directed energy, radiation, and possibly satellite transmissions (or other types of long-distance signal relay), were but a footnote to other CIA ventures described in the book, such as control through drugs. The focus was wrong and obscured primary threats.

July, 2015 footnote:
Physical copies of this book are becoming harder and harder to come by. There are reports of government agencies having bought up many of these copies in order to suppress information, hence driving up the price of obtaining extant copies.